Featured entries from our Journal

Details Are Part of Our Difference

Embracing the Evidence at Anheuser-Busch – Mid 1980s

529 Best Practices

David Booth on How to Choose an Advisor

The One Minute Audio Clip You Need to Hear

Tag: Vanguard

Index vs. Evidence-Based Investing: Why Settle for Better?

Part of our job here at Hill Investment Group is to keep a relatively close eye on financial industry news, so our clients don’t have to (unless they find it interesting). One technical tidbit caught our eye recently when Vanguard’s advisor news channel reported on how its index funds will be impacted by a change to the way the Center for Research in Security Prices (CRSP) will be reconstituting its indexes.

Wow, that’s a lot of jargon. Let’s translate.

Most investors are familiar with the broad strokes of index investing. An index fund identifies a slice of the market to invest in – such as U.S. small-company value stocks. The fund manager then picks an index that tracks that same swath, and buys up essentially everything that index is holding. For the past several years, Vanguard has been using CRSP indexes to fulfill that role.

Mostly, that’s a relatively sensible way to go about investing. CRSP indexes are at least as robust as any others for tracking particular markets. And index funds are certainly better than active managers, who spend their time and your money trying to dodge in and out of markets, without adding expected extra worth.

If there weren’t an even better – let’s say best – way to go about it, we’d probably be all in on index funds ourselves (and there are times we use them, when we feel they are the ideal tool for the job at hand). But, instead of investing in funds that follow indexes that follow a swath of the market … we typically prefer funds that skip the index “middle man,” and buy into the vast majority of a market swath directly. Dimensional Fund Advisors is one such fund manager, and the longest-tenured among them, having been around since 1981.

Vanguard’s recent announcement speaks to one reason we prefer the more direct approach. One bugaboo index funds face is what to do whenever its underlying index “reconstitutes,” or changes the securities it’s tracking. Every index does this from time to time. For example, say a small company becomes a big company. A small-cap index must then stop tracking its stock and, usually, pick a different one to track instead.

That means any index fund tracking that index must actually sell and buy those same swapped-out securities – and relatively quickly if it wants to keep accurately reflecting its target index. You may already be a step ahead of me if you recognize that this creates some pricing challenges. If several index fund managers are all trying to sell and buy the same securities at around the same time, the trades can end up costing more than if there weren’t an essentially artificial supply-and-demand issue at play.

To help alleviate (although probably not eliminate) that challenge, CRSP has announced it will spread its reconstitution activities across five days instead of just one.

Again, that’s a sensible idea, and it may help some. But remember, fund managers like Dimensional allow us to avoid the reconstitution challenge entirely by more directly tracking the small-cap value market (and many others). This is a topic for another post, but direct tracking also offers other advantages over being tied to an index. Suffice it to say here that not all small-cap value funds are equally as effective at capturing the expected premiums available from this relatively narrow market.

So, with respect to Vanguard’s recent announcement, “better” is nice. But when the choice is, “better or best?” … we still prefer best.

Buddy Reisinger on Vanguard’s Paper – Advisor’s Alpha

Just this week Gene Fama of the University of Chicago won the Nobel Prize in Economics for his research that fundamentally comes down to,“No one can consistently and predictably beat the market.”  Historically, investors have believed that they hired advisors to beat the market. If this can’t be done, then why would anyone pay to work with an investment advisor? It’s a great question and one that I’ve heard many times throughout my career.  In fact, I asked the same question myself before I became an advisor in 1997.

Put simply: A great investment advisor acts as “an emotional circuit breaker.” The real value of having an investment advisor that knows your goals, hopes, and dreams is that she or he can be your behavioral coach.  This is the person helping you “take the long view”.  The person that won’t let short term market gyrations disrupt a well thought out, long-term investment plan.

To learn more about “Advisor Alpha,” consider reading this April, 2013, research piece by Donald Bennyhoff and Francis Kinniry of Vanguard, one of the largest mutual fund companies in the world. Hill Investment Group holds Vanguard in high esteem for offering low-cost, tax-efficient, passive options. While Vanguard offers solid mutual funds, we are fortunate to be able to bring our clients what we feel are even better solutions (or choices).  The funds that our clients, and we ourselves, own are offered exclusively through advisors. For your information, each advisor at Hill Investment Group has an investment advisor serving their family too because we value the discipline or the advisor alpha.

Featured entries from our Journal

Details Are Part of Our Difference

Embracing the Evidence at Anheuser-Busch – Mid 1980s

529 Best Practices

David Booth on How to Choose an Advisor

The One Minute Audio Clip You Need to Hear

Hill Investment Group